Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The comparison of two concentrations of ACN extracts showed that the extracts with concentration of 1500 µg well−1 had more significant effect than of 600 µg well−1 (p = 0.016, F = 16.00).
Similar(59)
The comparison of antibacterial effects of two concentrations using statistical independent t test showed that the extracts with concentration of 1500 μg well−1 had overall more significant effect (p < 0.05) against S. sobrinus and S. mutans (Fig. 5a, b).
Integration of a ck(s) peak yields the concentration of a given component in that peak and comparison of the two concentrations yields the stoichiometry of the proteins in that peak.
By comparison of two MT concentrations (5 and 500 fmol to 5 µl drop of sample), signal increasing was more evident in the second case - 500 fmol of MT to 5 µl drop of sample.
A standard curve made of eight concentrations (twofold dilution from 0.5 to 0.004 mg/ml) of an amino terminal FLAG-tagged protein (P7582 Sigma) was used to assess comparison of replicate experiments (Supplementary Fig. S6A).
Rigorous coursework in one of five concentrations.
Open image in new window Fig. 5 The comparison between two concentrations of the extracts against S. sobrinus (a), S. mutans (b).
For comparison, two concentrations of gases are employed in this work, namely 500 and 250 ppm, and similar response trends can be obtained although the maximum sensitivities are reduced.
The current study provides a quantitative comparison of two tests for measuring the serum concentration of S100B; ELISA and the commercially available Elecsys®.
The effect of matrix was estimated by comparison of two replicates of an extract of a sample spiked with a standard at the same concentration level.
Here's a comparison of two series.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com