Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(36)
Table 3 presents a comparison of the maximum read ranges of the different receivers.
d Comparison of the maximum |RL| and EAB of Gmf/paraffin and CG/paraffin with reported values in studies.
Table 2 summarizes the comparison of the maximum CV biosorption capacity of various sorbent materials including PLP.
Comparison of the maximum responses of the slab in the two deck systems is shown in Table 2.
A comparison of the maximum displacement and fundamental natural frequency shows good agreement for a number of beams with periodically variable cross-sections and their equivalent uniform beams.
Table 3 presents the comparison of the maximum biosorption capacity (q max) of MB onto Luffa cylindrica fiber with those obtained by other researchers.
Similar(24)
In Table 1, considering different values of μ, the comparisons of the maximum upper bounds (tau_{q}) are given for (tau _{0}=0).
The comparisons of the maximum permitted underflow solids flux calculated from both an initial undensified thickener and a densified thickener were achieved.
A total of 90 damage cases are considered and comparisons of the maximum loads and the location where these take place is carried out relative to the intact case.
Comparisons of the maximum tensile force (Fmax), initial buckling load (Fc), number of cycles to fracture, the total energy dissipated (Wtot) and the energy dissipated at the first cycle of ductility of 4 (Wμ=4) between the numerical models and the physical tests are carried out.
Pairwise comparisons of the maximum nucleotide identities for MCP among different hosts using the MEGA 4.0.2 program [ 27] are shown in Table 4.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com