Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(29)
Fisher's exact test was used for comparison of sensitivity and specificity between groups.
Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and likelihood ratios of digestive colonization for ESBL-E in respiratory sample in the two centers.
Table 5 The comparison of sensitivity and specificity among the various tests Investigations Sensitivity Specificity p values Chest X-ray 66.67 46.15 0.186 Mantoux test 76.92 62.5 0.033 QuantiFERON TB Gold test 66.67 57.14 0.198.
Table 3 Comparison of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of PET, mediastinoscopy (MES), EUS and EBUS for restaging the mediastinum in lung cancer n Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy PET [44] 8 trials 380 59 85 MES 3 trials 204 71 100 81 EUS [45, 46] 2 trials 58 70 75 96 100 86 92 EBUS [47, 48] 2 trials 185 67–76 86–185 77–80.
A comparison of sensitivity of the estimates of bulk elastic modulus of the M H system and diffusion coefficient of hydrogen, acquired from three alternative transfer functions (TFs) of transport of hydrogen through a thin membrane specimen of metal, was performed with respect to the uncertainty of equilibrium concentration of hydrogen, its partial molar volume and thickness of the specimen.
The model results used for comparison of sensitivity tests were the reaction forces (in Newtons) at the carnassial bite position and the working- and balancing-side joint constraints.
Similar(31)
Comparison of sensitivities and specificities of indices using McNemar test.
Applications published to date are summarized in a comprehensive table with description of the aforementioned details including comparison of sensitivities.
Besides statistical significance, we also calculated the size of treatment effects estimated by the ANCOVA and the ADAS-CogIRT methodologies for a comparison of sensitivities.
Statistical comparison tests between the ML score and the MEWS for sensitivity and specificity were done by applying the McNemar test to the disease group (comparison of sensitivities) and the nondiseased group (comparison of specificities) [ 30].
A comparison of sensitivities reported in the literature revealed an inexplicable large variation of up to a factor of 6 in the thermal sensitivities of CFU-S and GM-CFC.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com