Sentence examples for comparison of responsiveness from inspiring English sources

Inferential 95% confidence bands were calculated to enable statistical comparison of responsiveness estimates as recommended by Tryon [ 32].

This study provides comparison of responsiveness of two common HRQoL assessment tools used in the patients with revision THA, the HHS and SF-36.

This is the first time a head-to-head comparison of responsiveness and MCID calculations have been carried out in 4 subpopulations of LBP patients.

Finally, we used generic anchors instead of disease-specific measures to conduct the comparisons of responsiveness across the mental disorders.

Therefore head-to-head comparisons of responsiveness in low back pain (LBP) specific instruments in different study settings and in different subpopulations of back pain patients are of paramount importance.

The choice of an evaluative instrument has been hampered by the lack of head-to-head comparisons of responsiveness and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in subpopulations of low back pain (LBP).

Thus, concurrent comparisons of responsiveness in subpopulations of LBP patients are warranted, and to the authors' knowledge no head-to-head responsiveness assessment of LBP only versus leg pain (defined as leg pain with or without LBP) and primary sector (PrS) patients versus secondary sector (SeS) patients have been carried out.

✓ = tested; ✗ = not tested; * Reported in Cano et al 2004 [ 6]; ** Reported in Cano et al 2006 [ 28]; *** Although not including MID in our responsiveness paper (Cano et al, 2006 [ 28]), we include a comparison of relative responsiveness to existing PROs used in CD research in order to increase the interpretability of CDIP-58 change scores against these measures.

Glenny C, Stolee P, Husted J, Thompson M, Berg K. Comparison of the responsiveness of the FIM and the interRAI Post Acute Care Assessment Instrument in rehabilitation of older adults.

Comparison of neural responsiveness to specific skin sites in detection and discrimination conditions took into account all relevant electrodes across the four experimental runs that continued into discrimination.

This study represents a controlled head-to-head comparison of the responsiveness of different progenitor lineages to BMP-2.