Sentence examples for comparison of rates between from inspiring English sources

Comparison of rates between groups was conducted using the χ2 test and P < 0.05 was regarded as a significant difference.

The comparison of rates between ethnic groups in England and their countries of origin is problematic for a number of reasons.

The medical records of the patients in the control group were not examined to determine the prevalence of recording of mental health diagnoses so a comparison of rates between the two groups could not be made.

A comparison of average values between two classes was performed by means of a t-test, and a comparison of rates between two classes was performed by means of a Chi-square test.

Although SHAs have since been replaced by smaller clinical commissioning groups, the SHAs existed while our data were collected and we feel that a comparison of rates between different SHAs could be important in highlighting possible differences in statin therapy initiation rates within England.

The comparison of rates between British Indians and India is also limited by the fact that the data from Ahmedabad cover an earlier time period (1993 1997) and there were problems with the quality of the data (Parkin et al, 2002).

It is simple to measure but does not allow easy comparisons of rates between different geographic locations or different maternity wards.

Advantages are that the data collection follows national standards and it provides the groundwork for benchmarking and comparisons of rates between the paediatric hospitals in Australia, the data is collected routinely reducing the need to collect information from case records or regular audits which is time consuming and often takes nurses away from providing nursing care [ 55].

Because it does not assume linearity of changes over the entire record, WRTDS allows for a comparison of rates of change between different parts of the record.

The inclusion of two post-operative assessments also allows exploration of outcome trajectories and comparison of rates of improvement between different outcome domains (e.g. pain, function, participation).

This distinction is relevant to the comparison of evolutionary rates between orthologs versus evolutionary rates between closest paralogs [ 22].