Sentence examples for comparison of publications from inspiring English sources

Fig. 4 Comparison of publications in conferences and journals.

It is important to point out that we proceed with the comparison of publications only when the coauthor's CV is located.

Certain plant designs and overall concepts, as well as different methodical approaches with different regional frame conditions, time horizons, scenarios and cost parameters, make a comprehensive comparison of publications difficult.

40 41 In addition, a comparison of publications with protocols of cancer trials revealed that intention to treat analysis was done more often than was reported in the publications.

Our comparison of publication quality using IF, citation reports, and number of articles published in leading general-medicine journals demonstrated that the gap between ML and the other two regions (HK, TW) remained considerable at the end of the study period (Table 1, Fig. 4).

A comparison of these publications highlights issues that psychiatry will have to grapple with in the next decade.

Comparison of the publication and citation performances of researchers from primary care with the highest output volume, identified from the full search results (82 169 records) for this study, showed that 141 researchers were authors or coauthors of 6813 (8.3%) of the retrieved records.

This classification, based on surgical aspects of endometriosis, allows the exploration and comparisons of major publications over a period of more than 30 years with the aim of evaluating whether endometriosis in the adolescent is a hidden, progressive and severe disease.

Nelson's (2009, p. 994) comparison of IP licenses, publications and patents found IP licenses to be the most reliable indicator of "downstream knowledge utilisation" as the "competing economic interests" between licensors and licensees ensure that the licensing agreement is a fair representation of industry demand.

A comparison of protocols and publications of 102 randomised trials found that 62% of trials reports had at least one primary outcome that was changed, introduced, or omitted compared with the protocol.

The number of citations for a particular paper is shown to be more relevant and important in comparison with the number of publications.