Sentence examples for comparison of probabilities from inspiring English sources
Fig. 1 Comparison of probabilities of exact reconstruction with different dimensions of measurement matrices (M = 128, N = 256).
The numerical results on the curves represent the mean of 500 attempts, these results are shown in Fig. 3, where the number of measurements M varied from 0 to N. Fig. 3 Comparison of probabilities of exact reconstruction for different numbers of measurements with different dimensions of measurement matrices (N = 256, k = 40).
It should be noted that this analysis is for illustration only, since the comparison of probabilities usually requires risk estimates from a prospective study design.
For a comparison of probability theory and ranking theory see Spohn (2009, sct. 3).
Open image in new window Fig. 4 Comparison of probability distribution curves.
It is a simplistic method which reduces the shape matching problem to sampling, normalizations, and comparison of probability distributions.
The normalized model was additionally validated through comparison of probability levels of transformed data with the probability of occurrence of actual (crude set) data points.
Besides this there is also comparison of probability and deterministic approach to the evaluation of static reliability of the building constructions.
Comparison of probability Density Distributions (PDDs) generated from these data and the neural network analysis revealed improvement in the learning of the welders with progress of training.
Comparison of probability density functions of the maximum annual TS wind velocities fitted to the simulated and recorded data led to encouraging results, suggesting that the approach may have extensive applications in wind engineering and reliability assessments.
[Back to text] [Back to Text] [Back to Text] A comparison of probability ratios tells us that E provides slightly more incremental evidence for H than for H*, whereas a comparison of odds ratios indicates that E provides much more incremental evidence for H* than for H.
