Exact(1)
However, to test that this assumption was correct, DNA from our discovery set was genotyped using the Affymetrix® Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0, which allowed comparison of principle component analysis of our data with 90 representative samples from each of the YRI and CEU populations.
Similar(59)
But it is your second point — concerning the comparison of epistemic principles — which I perhaps don't understand.
Finally, an extensive comparison of the principles of both methods was performed.
ABI-Sanger and 454 sequencing protocols share few common steps but differ in many ways (Table 1) and a thorough comparison of the principles of the two sequencing procedures has been provided before [ 9].
Comparison between some of principle peaks in IR for K sul) and 1 (cm-1) and Table S3.
A comparison of the multivariate approach (principle components analysis/absolute principle component score, PCA/APCS) and the chemical mass balance model (CMB) shows that the identification of sources and calculation of source contribution based on the CMB were more objective and acceptable when source profiles were known and source composition was complex.
Furthermore, we tested only a small number of sputum and BAL specimens for comparison with culture in a proof-of-principle experiment.
First of all, the application of the comparison principle to the equations of v and v̅ yields (overline{v}>v) directly.
As a proof of principle, a comparison of the allele frequency differences of the 93 EuroAIMs between Iberians and Canary Islanders using the Cochran-Armitage trend test resulted in 12 tests with p<0.05 (Table 3).
A simulation allows the comparison of their respective working principle.
By (2.2), one can get frac{dR}{dt}leq R t) biggl[lambdavarphi(t) pbigl(R t) bigr -frac{nu }{3} bigr -frac{nu by the similar method as that of the proof of Theorem 2.2, and by use of the comparison principle, one can also prove that the zero steady state of (2.2) is globally stable if (nu >lambdabar{varphi}{.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com