Sentence examples for comparison of patents from inspiring English sources

Topics include requirements of utility, novelty, and non-obviousness; eligible subject matter; applying for a patent, including patent searches and the language of patent claims; infringement, defenses, and remedies; comparison of patents with other forms of intellectual property (copyrights, trade secrets, and trademarks).

This chapter summarizes the legal requirement of trade secret law, comparison of patents and trade secrets, the practices and agreements used for trade secret protection, the risks from mishandled trade secrets, remedies when trade secrets are wrongfully taken or used, non-disclosure agreements, and confidentiality provisions in contracts.

Fig. 11 Comparison of patents owned by foreign residents vs. domestic residents in Europe for 2005.

The comparison of patents to genes was performed using the criteria used by Jensen and Murray [ 10]; specifically using BLAST version 2.2.25+ [ 23] to match at least 150 nucleotides and an e-value of 0. This was performed using the BLAST command: blastn -evalue 1e-307 -word_size 150.

To provide a comprehensive comparison of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure versus medical therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and demonstrated PFO.

First, the status of patents-residents is relatively high in comparison to patents-non-residents.

By comparison, the number of patent litigations filed in the United States in 2015 was 5,830 (down from the high-water mark of 6,114 in 2013), where U.S. IP-related litigations as a whole totaled around 14,500 cases (including about 5,000 copyright and about 3,500 trademark actions).

These include classification, comparison of design concepts, finding patent holes and building patent fences, design knowledge acquisition, and learning abstract concepts.

For more on the Directive, and an international comparison of positions on gene patents, see Knoppers (1999).

To Mr. Kress in early 2011, any comparison to Monsanto — whose large blocks of patents he had to work around, and whose thousands of employees worldwide dwarfed the 750 he employed in Florida at peak harvest times — seemed far-fetched.

Nelson's (2009, p. 994) comparison of IP licenses, publications and patents found IP licenses to be the most reliable indicator of "downstream knowledge utilisation" as the "competing economic interests" between licensors and licensees ensure that the licensing agreement is a fair representation of industry demand.