Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(14)
Contingency Table Analysis was first performed for comparison of groups with regard to categorical variables [ 22].
ANCOVA is a robust method for comparison of groups with divergent body weight and composition (Arch et al., 2006).
For comparison of groups with regard to assumed continuously distributed variables, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used [ 8].
Similarly, the comparison of groups with different weight status development can only be of a descriptive nature.
The analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle, except the comparison of groups with a satisfactory or unsatisfactory recovery.
One-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA, studentized-range test, Bonferroni's inequality, and Chi-square test were used for comparison of groups, with 5% as a significant level.
Similar(46)
Chi2 tests for comparison of group with no information to those with information, and heterogeneity among groups within strata with known data.
After significant main effects, we performed post hoc comparisons of groups with the Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Walsh test.
Comparisons of groups with regard to assumed continuously-distributed variables were performed with Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), with repeated measurements and initial scores as covariate [ 16].
Table 4 depicts the odds ratios for the comparisons of groups with predicted enzyme activity between patients with ESCC or EAC, and controls.
Comparisons of groups with respect to 'at least one adverse event' versus 'no adverse event' were performed with Fisher's Exact tests.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com