Fig. 4 Comparison of genes expression profiles determined by qRT-PCR and DEG sequencing.
c Comparison of genes involved in cell cycle in tiller buds of seedlings at 34 DAG among different transgenic lines.
Dragging and dropping of the horizontal information bars at the top of the window facilitates the comparison of genes and QTLs in different trait categories.
A great deal of information relevant to evolution is contained within the genes of a single species, but vastly more information is available through comparison of genes across species.
Figure 6 shows Venn diagram depicting comparison of genes found (and then matched in HomoloGene) in four organisms.
However, a comparison of genes within each group revealed striking differences between EP156T cells and PC3 cells.
The comparison of genes located adjacent to orthologous TBDR genes in the different Xanthomonas strains showed that in most cases, these regions are syntenic (Table S3).
The first goal of identifying "bona fide" Mta1 targets have been achieved by initial comparison of genes regulated by Mta1 wild type and the Mta1 knockout.
A comparison of genes flanking the fHANT-AC (Fig. 1b) in Ustilago maydis and T. reesei genomes did not reveal additional genes that appear to have been obtained by HGT.
Comparison of genes common between the miRNA target site predictions (the 382 genes from the "5 or more list") and SNL-regulated mRNAs (1806 transcripts found to significantly change in L4 DRG) showed an overlap of 46 genes.
Comparison of genes amplified in our samples with published gene lists from two large melanoma studies (Stark and Hayward 2007; Gast et al., 2010) while revealing very little overlap (see Fig. 4) did identify BRAF, MDM2, and NRAS, genes known to be important in melanoma [5], [17], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29].
