Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
comparison of findings
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "comparison of findings" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the analysis or evaluation of results from different studies or experiments. Example: "In this section, we will conduct a comparison of findings from various research papers to identify common trends."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Academia
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
But because the studies are being run in different ways, direct comparison of findings is impossible.
News & Media
Comparison of Findings and Recommendations in Spine MR Reports of Neuroradiologists and Musculoskeletal Radiologists.
Academia
This is an extension of the Krau research, and a comparison of findings between the two sites should prove fruitful.
News & Media
A comparison of findings with 2 earlier studies from the same department was also performed.
Gerontological nursing content in baccalaureate nursing programs: comparison of findings from 1997 and 2003.
Academia
Yet a comparison of findings of Hohmeyer and Wolff (2010) with those of ISG et al. (2011) suggests the opposite.
Science
ECHO reporting and storage of images and video clips allow for accurate comparison of findings obtained at different time spots and should thus be mandatory.
Science
Moreover, by situating my reviewed literature and subsequent comparison of findings with global understandings of inclusive education and post-conflict reconstruction, modest transferability is possible.
Rats are widely used in experimental neurobiological research, and rat brain atlases are important resources for identifying brain regions in the context of experimental microsurgery, tissue sampling, and neuroimaging, as well as comparison of findings across experiments.
Academia
Comparison of findings that were obtained from cyclic voltammograms of nanotube-modified GCPE with that of plain GCPE suggests that the carbon nanotube-modified GCPEs have slower electron transfer than plain GCPE.
Science
Table 4 Comparison of findings on CT scan, CXR, and ultrasound of three patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia PJP CTCT scan CXR Ultrasound Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 The infection spares the subpleural areas in patient 1, involves mainly the subpleural areas in patient 2, and involves wider lung parenchyma in patient 3.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When writing about research, clearly state the criteria used for the "comparison of findings" to ensure transparency and avoid ambiguity. For example, specify whether you are comparing statistical significance, effect sizes, or methodological approaches.
Common error
Avoid making sweeping statements when presenting a "comparison of findings". Acknowledge the limitations of each study and the potential for confounding factors to influence the observed differences.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "comparison of findings" functions primarily as a noun phrase. It refers to the act of comparing results or outcomes, typically within research or analysis. Ludwig examples show this phrase used to discuss methodologies, data, and study results. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
Science
76%
Academia
15%
News & Media
5%
Less common in
Formal & Business
4%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "comparison of findings" is a grammatically correct and frequently used noun phrase, especially in scientific and academic writing. According to Ludwig AI, it's perfectly valid for use. Its primary function is to describe the process of comparing results or outcomes from different studies or analyses. Usage is highest in the scientific field, according to Ludwig examples, followed by academia and news media. When using this phrase, ensure clarity in the comparison criteria and avoid overgeneralizing the conclusions. Alternatives like "analysis of results" or "evaluation of outcomes" can be used for variety, although they slightly shift the focus. Always consider the context to ensure the most accurate and effective communication.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
findings comparison
Shortens the original phrase while retaining the meaning.
contrast of findings
Specifically points out the differences between results.
analysis of results
Focuses on the analytical aspect rather than just the comparison.
evaluation of outcomes
Highlights the assessment of the results' significance.
study comparison
A more concise way to refer to the comparison between studies.
cross-study analysis
Highlights the analytical aspect across multiple studies.
review of data
Emphasizes the process of examining the collected data.
assessment of results
Indicates a formal judgment of the findings.
examination of outcomes
Emphasizes a detailed inspection of the results.
collation of data
Focuses on gathering and arranging the data for comparison.
FAQs
How can I effectively present a "comparison of findings" in a research paper?
Use tables or figures to visually represent the "comparison of findings". Clearly label each element and provide a concise summary of the key similarities and differences in the text. Be aware of the risk of "overgeneralizing conclusions".
What are some common challenges in conducting a "comparison of findings" across different studies?
Different methodologies, sample sizes, and outcome measures can complicate the "comparison of findings". Ensure you address these limitations in your discussion and consider using statistical techniques like meta-analysis when appropriate.
Is there a difference between "analysis of results" and "comparison of findings"?
"Analysis of results" refers to the process of interpreting the data from a single study. "Comparison of findings", on the other hand, involves examining the results from multiple studies to identify patterns, similarities, and differences. "Analysis of results" is more focused while the other is relational.
When is it inappropriate to make a "comparison of findings"?
Avoid making a "comparison of findings" when the studies being compared are fundamentally different in their design, population, or intervention. Such comparisons can lead to misleading conclusions and invalidate the research.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested