Sentence examples for comparison meaning from inspiring English sources

We still use the same generated outbreaks for this comparison, meaning that the true outbreaks are rectangular.

However, this initial evaluation of the new intervention did not use a control comparison, meaning that if any clinical change did occur it may not be due to the content of the module.

Two types of evaluations are performed: exact comparison (meaning that the span of a proposed brain region must exactly match a manually annotated brain region) and lenient comparison (meaning that the span of an identified brain region may be equal or smaller than a manually annotated brain region).

Interestingly there is no other distinction between any other group comparisons; meaning the high and the low are not different in terms of when they access the material.

No other differences between block types were shown to be significantly different within conditions in pairwise comparisons, meaning that the significant difference indications in the ANOVA in conditions c1, c2, and c3 indicate negligible effects, if any.

As an unsupervised criterion we used a q-value cut-off ≤ 0.05 for the P13 vs. P22 planned comparisons, meaning that the maximum expected proportion of false positives incurred when calling a particular gene 'differentially expressed' is 5%.

Also, the results of group comparisons should be interpreted with caution considering that there was no adjustment for multiplicity and the study was not powered for these comparisons, meaning that definite conclusions cannot be made regarding the relative risk of a given adverse event.

Second, the study sample size could be considered small, with power below 80% in effectiveness comparisons, meaning that the study may be limited in terms of guaranteeing than differences in effectiveness could exist between the two groups of GAD therapy analyzed in this study.

In such cases, we performed both comparisons (meaning that the identity of Scer1 and Scer2 was switched in the second case).

In comparison to other patient groups, patients with UPS had generally lower SF-36 subscale means, meaning a poorer QoL.

This would significantly increase the cost of PED in comparison with SAC, meaning that PED became the more costly option.