Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
The comparison included 4 seasons and 2 solar activity levels (low and moderate).
Results comparison included computational and user time, quantification of the deteriorated area error between manual and automatically detected zones.
Data collected for comparison included time to implant, ease of implantation, firmness of press-fit, and fixation options after implantation.
The performance comparison included the results obtained by conventional MOE, subspace MOE, and optimal MSINR detectors.
The comparison included 25 functions (F1 F25) defined in the CEC'05 benchmark [42].
When the subject of a comparison included in two of the patient groups, an independent sample t-test was performed.
The DEGs in the C + F vs C comparison included enriched genes that were related to fatty acid elongation, wax and cutin syntheses, phenylpropanoid metabolism, and flavone synthesis.
The comparison included the site, the total number of feeders, the size, the presence in eloquent site, and the presence of deep venous drainage.
Outputs aggregated in this step for further comparison included total generations (total vehicles released in 1 h), and total attractions (total number of vehicles completing their journey in 1 h).
Items of comparison included the "cracks" in the universe and shifting tectonic plates, and the "vortex" and the tsunami swallowing up entire villages.
The comparison included heritabilities of 11 traits from 6 species.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com