Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The two groups were matched following specific criteria for comparison: implant length, diameter, site of the implant, and patient's gender.
In comparison, implant survivorship was 99% in the standard total hip arthroplasty cohort, with 1 revision due to peri-prosthetic fracture which was successfully treated with a femoral component revision.
Similar(58)
Table 3 Synopsis of included studies on dental implants and prosthetics on dental implants in order of publication year Author Year Study type Population Treatment Comparison Patients Implants Implant survival Implant success Prosthes.
This implies that comparison of implant stability in terms of ISQ for identical implant systems between different studies has to be done with caution and need to be corrected when used for comparisons in systematic reviews.
By stratifying patients according to disease grade and/or stage, we found a comparison of implant to patient survival provides a useful measure of disease-specific implant efficacy (Fig. 10).
Comparison of implant failure with other studies shows that Wile et al. [13] reported no implant failures in 25 subtrochanteric fractures treated with high angle compression hip screws.
However, orthodontic space closure patients had better periodontal health in comparison with implant substitution patients.
Space closure patients also showed better periodontal health in comparison with implant patients.
A direct comparison of implant and conventional prosthetics was made in two retrospective studies of Krieger and coworkers [25] and Dueled and coworkers [26].
Comparison of implant supported mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures on quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
Comparison of implant failure with other studies shows that Asher et al. [2[t11]] had a failure rate of 33% with Blade plates, and Ruff et al. [21] a failure rate of 11% with DHS.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com