Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(54)
Table 3 shows the between-group comparison for each diagnosis.
There's not a one-to-one comparison for each of them, obviously.
In the following subsections, we present the results of the comparison for each recommendation scenario separately.
Figure 5 shows the results of comparison for each kernel function.
Table 4 shows the comparison of the accuracy comparison for each algorithm.
The comparison for each of the seven ZnO-nc emission centres for the samples annealed at 450 °C.
Similar(6)
In each iteration, the calculation of Equation (12) includes K comparisons for each of N subcarriers.
In each iteration, the computation of (16) requires K comparisons for each of N sub-carriers.
Microarray data comparisons for each growth condition allow the identification of mutants that failed to survive the imposed growth selection.
Table 2 (accuracy) and Table 3 (reaction time) present the summary statistics and statistical comparisons for each experiment.
Table 10 tabulates the average number of comparisons for each query between the AME-SAD and the MRMEH method.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com