The third component, which is less interpretable, is what we call "context," as it involves themes related to the comparison of explanations (theoretical context) and society and culture (broader context).
We theorize that productive learning of algebra is supported by reflection on multiple solution strategies through comparison and explanation of the reasons behind the strategies (Comparison and Explanation of Multiple Strategies: CEMS).
Covers elementary statistics, probability, and other types of quantitative reasoning useful for description, estimation, comparison, and explanation.
For the purpose comparison and explanation, the mechanical properties of GO cement and carbon-fiber cement were also investigated.
A detailed demonstration of this method comparison, with explanation of the settings chosen for StepPCO, is provided in Figure S3.
As would be expected, the results present an intriguing pattern of risk factors in these widely divergent settings; however, each indicator is related to a sub-population, comparisons and explanations are limited.
We have attempted to address this by deliberately employing a robust middle range theory (NPT) to provide an analytical framework that allows for comparison and explanation of how this technology was successfully brought into everyday, routine, use.
To address the above question, in the present study, we will employ the equal probable paradigm utilized by Jacobsen and Schröger [ 26, 27] to verify memory-comparison-based explanations of MMN, which has been used in visual modality [ 12, 13, 18].
Arguments about the second premise then may require comparison between theistic explanations of morality and these rival views.
By comparison with social/structural explanations, the range of types of responses based on individual characteristics and behaviours as the direct cause of health inequalities was narrower in this study as shown in Table 2. Within the range of responses listed in Tables 1 and 2 some explanations were more prominent than others.
