Sentence examples for comparison evaluation from inspiring English sources
All this, Verhaeghe points out, is fundamental to the neoliberal model, which everywhere insists on comparison, evaluation and quantification.
Fingerprint examiners follow the analysis, comparison, evaluation, and verification (ACE-V) protocol [5].
Also there is no comparison evaluation to determine if using these Stylometric features in addition to n-gram features enhances classification performance.
The study involved a mixed-method (multivariate predictive and multiple case comparison) evaluation of six organizationally similar but spatially different URCs.
Cost ((sum _{i=1}^N C(S_i))) measured as the sum of operations performed to evaluate diverse subsets of N queries, where each operation represents a distance computation and a comparison evaluation.
Also, comparison evaluation between experimental results of this paper and previously presented properties of compressive strength properties of normal strength concrete (NSC) and high strength concrete was carried out.
The results of CMOS and paired comparison evaluations are respectively shown in Figures 7 and 8. Remarkably, the proposed soft context-clustered HMM is noticed to outperform the conventional hard decision tree structure for all training utterances.
The Passing-Bablok procedure is a linear regression method developed for method comparison evaluations without dependence on the assignment of either one of the two compared methods as the reference.
The chapter finally presents the research introducing the idea of self-comparison evaluation, which compares a project's actual engineering performance to its possible better performance searched by genetic algorithms in order to make suggestions for possible engineering performance improvement.
Additionally, given the temporal limitations of fMRI, it is difficult to assess how the reported selective attention effects relate to initial stimulus encoding, comparison, response execution, or post-comparison evaluation processes.
Because of the wide variety of comparisons, with fewer than 200 participants in each of the individual comparisons, evaluation of this modality compared to other methods was limited.
