Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
Table 1 Trusted personal device comparison Device Characteristic R1 R2 R3 Smartphones, PDAs Y N N DORIS/DIVA Y N N Encryptakey Y Y N Smart cards Y Y N Network smart cards Y Y N Mobile and portable TCP Y Y Y.
Part 3: SW Comparison (Device and Host).
Similar(58)
For the second comparison devices from the first group with different cross-sectional areas were analyzed.
For comparison, devices based on bare Ni NWs were also prepared (inset).
By comparison, devices can stay in the other anechoic chambers for up to 24 hours at a time.
The solid horizontal line indicates the mean difference between the blood pressure readings for the two comparison devices.
The solar-to-electric conversion efficiency limitations of state-of-the-art CuInS2 based devices are discussed using a comparison with device simulation.
For comparison a device with typical high photoinduced absorption demonstrating large suppression of absorption bleaching was shown and interpreted.
As a point of comparison, last year device shipments increased by 2.7%, according to Gartner's calculations.
Precise evaluation of the field-effect mobility is crucial for the fair comparison of device performance between different material platforms.
For the sake of comparison, a device was also fabricated incorporating the co-sprayed perovskite film based on run 10m (substrate vibration-assisted co-spray).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com