Sentence examples for comparison defining from inspiring English sources

The two sets of data (as outlined above) were analyzed separately, following these procedures: initial familiarization with content across all documents; generation of initial codes (categories and/or keywords); generation of initial themes; review of themes using constant comparison; defining and naming themes, and organization/presentation of themes.

c The CiaR recognition helix was identified according to the OmpR family comparison defining DNA binding sites [ 37]. d The recognition helix of S. pneumoniae R6 CiaR is shown for comparison.

Performance index was prepared using a method of pairwise comparison defined in AHP as being explained in Tables 5 and 6.

Time was defined as the only parameter to be taken into account for analysis and 6 different conditions were defined: one for each time point comparison defined.

It is difficult to make direct comparisons; defining what makes an "athlete," for example, is problematic, and police and judicial procedures vary from county to county.

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a multi-dimensional, multi-level and multifactorial decision-making method based on the idea that it is possible to prioritize elements by: grouping them into meaningful categories and sub-categories; performing pairwise comparisons; defining a coherent framework of quantitative and qualitative knowledge; measuring intangible domains.

For comparisons defined under (i) and (ii) we also examined mtDNA differentiation.

Comparisons defined a priori were FM versus HS, FM versus HN, SBI versus HS, and SBI versus HN.

For multiple group comparisons, significant treatment effects were determined using linear contrasts for all pairwise comparisons defined by an ANOVA model with one fixed factor for treatment (6 comparisons for a model consisting of 4 treatment groups: untransfected cells (N = 5), cells transfected with CD22-RTM (N = 17), EPL (N = 17), or Dystrophin-RTM (N = 5)).

Comparison: defines what will be compared with the intervention.

Statistical analysis was performed by students t-test or by ANOVA followed by the Tukey's multiple comparison test defining different error probabilities as significant (* p≤0.05), (** p≤0.01), (*** p≤0.001).