Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(19)
Table 4 Multiple comparisons of subgroups: postoperative bone level Adjusted p values multiple comparison Control group bone level < 4 mm Control group bone level > 4 mm 0.0453 Control group bone level > 4 mm Perforation group bone level < 4 mm 0.3174 0.7586 Study group bone level < 4 mm Perforation group bone level > 4 mm 0.0203 0.0203 0.0203.
The biggest limitation was that it is unfeasible to provide a comparison control group.
A comparison control group of periprosthetic tissue was used for immunohistochemistry.
Sixty-three healthy volunteers were also recruited for comparison (control group).
Comparison: control group was defined as either (enhanced) usual care, wait-list control (WLS) group or no further treatment for comorbid depression-CHD.
However, there are many limitations to their study such as the fact that they did not include a comparison control group.
Similar(41)
In both studies, comparison control groups received identical treatment but without the thermal imaging element.
However, case ascertainment, definitions and assessment methodology, and comparison control groups chosen must be considered in order to understand the true significance of these findings.
Lacking a comparison or control group, such results have to be interpreted with the greatest of caution.
By comparison, the control group means are relatively even.
NR2A/NR2B ratio of CSD group significantly increased in comparison with control group (p = 0.018).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com