Of the 14 combined interventions, six were randomized controlled trials, three were non-randomized comparison control design studies, and six were non-experimental single group design studies.
For comparison, control and SF containing samples were evaluated for these properties.
By comparison, control areas remained relatively unchanged across the same time period.
The comparison control included four supportive phone calls to the PLWH alone.
In comparison, control cultures were dominated by Eubacterium sp., Methanocalculus halotolerans and Methanococcoides alaskense.
A set of normal functional clothing was employed as a comparison (Control).
For group comparison, control subjects were matched to migraine patients for use of data from the first (16 control, 13 migraine) or second (8 control, 9 migraine) session.
For comparison, control of ZnO NPs and ZnO CTS NPs was prepared in the absence of stabilizer following the similar procedure.
This is in contrast to comparison control patients treated with standard wound care, demonstrating complete epithelialization rates of 25 to 39%.
In comparison, control (prepared without enzyme treatment) had significantly (p < 0.05) lower juice yield, α amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition activity of 59, 8 and 17%, respectively.
