In online videos, Hoque et al. developed an automated system to distinguish between naturally occurring spontaneous smiles under frustrating and delightful stimuli by exploring their temporal patterns given video of both, evaluated and compared two variants of Support Vector Machine (SVM), Hidden Markov Models (HMM), and Hidden-State Conditional Random Fields (HCRF) for binary classification.
We compare two variants of our proposed method to a maximum-likelihood-based baseline method, the Inferelator 1.1 [ 15] and a simpler sparse regression approach (see Methods).
We compared two variants of a LASA scale (score range 0-100) with different anchoring points [perfect health to worst possible health (subjective health estimation, SHE) and perfect health to death (SHED)] in 84 patients with advanced breast cancer.
Results: We compare two variants of our Poisson method, with or without optimization of the transfer function, to four different MDS-based algorithms two metric MDS methods using different stress functions, a non-metric version of MDS and ChromSDE, a recently described, advanced MDS method on a wide range of simulated datasets.
To measure the predictive power of SML for identifying protein interactions between HIV-1 and Human, we compared three variants of SML with two baseline classifiers.
We compare three variants of the semantic scan: static (topics are learned from historical data and do not change from day to day), dynamic (topics are recalculated each day using the most recent two weeks of data) and incremental (not only using the static topics but also learning additional 'emerging' topics that differ substantially from the static topics).
In [19], the coding efficiency of the DISCOVER DVC scheme is compared to two variants of H.264/AVC with low encoding complexity: H.264/AVC Intra (i.e., all the frames are Intra coded) and H.264/AVC No Motion (i.e., interframe coding with zero motion vectors).
When nucleotide sequences of the three variants were compared, two of three variants showed nearly identical sequences.
Structural variants were analyzed by comparing two sources of information: relative normal/tumor read-level coverage and anomalously mapping read pairs.
We excluded studies comparing two different interventions or variants of an intervention.
Here, we compared three enhanced variants of the originally reported VSFP2.1 (Fig. 1).
