Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The RHR of recurrence comparing specialists and nonspecialists was calculated with tumour size, nodal status and histological prognostic group as independent variables.
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001, independent samples t-tests comparing specialists with CR program perceptions of the percentage of patients meeting preferable and acceptable benchmarks, and of the appropriate number of days' wait.
Similar(57)
This analysis compared specialists who provided remote outreach with those who provided outreach to other rural areas.
The SURE study compared specialist care and usual general care, both within the secondary care service.
Non-parametric tests were then used to compare specialist and CR program perceptions of benchmarks and wait times.
We compared specialist referral rates amongst three primary care models: 1) Enhanced Fee-for-service, 2) Capitation- Non-Interdisciplinary (CAP-NI), 3) Capitation – Interdisciplinary (CAP-I).
Only one study [ 14] has compared non-specialists with specialists (allocation to specialists versus non-specialists was not random).The interventions were CBT-based or counselling-based (psychodynamic therapy was also evaluated in one study), and the nurses were trained in these approaches.
Compared to specialists, non-specialists reported greater need for both knowledge and skills.
Only one trial was conducted in the UK, comparing a specialist cancer centre with four community hospitals up to 25 miles away (Pace et al, 2009).
Relative differences in mean costs between multimorbid versus non-multimorbid individuals were higher for primary care physicians compared to specialists, even though the mean costs for specialists were almost twice as high in both samples.
When different types of CVD were compared between specialist and non-specialist institutions, a large proportion of CVDs (41%) in specialist institution fell in the category of other CVDs because advanced diagnostic facilities of complicated heart diseases were available only at the specialist centre.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com