Sentence examples for comparing rod from inspiring English sources

(D ) Summary data across cells comparing rod → cone and cone → rod interaction indices for spikes and excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs).

(C ) Average spike responses from an example cell comparing rod → cone (top) and cone → rod (bottom) interactions.

(E ) Average spike responses from an example cell comparing rod → cone interactions for short (0.2 s, top) and long (0.8 s, bottom) time offsets.

Similarly, the results of single cell experiments closely matched data from ERG. Considering these points we believe that we can draw valid conclusions from comparing rod versus cone ON-BC responses and visually guided behavior mediated by rod and cone circuits.

Here we adapted a commercial in vivo ERG system for transretinal ERG recordings from rod and cone photoreceptors and compared rod and cone signaling between ex vivo and in vivo environments.

After siRNA knockdown of huntingtin was confirmed by western blot (Fig.  3A), we compared rod formation in STHdh mCerulean cofilin cells treated with huntingtin siRNA or a control siRNA during and after heat shock stress by visualizing mCerulean cofilin (Fig.  3B and C).

For this reason, it was impossible to compare rod-mediated visual restoration in treated vs. untreated eyes using these behavior tests.

We first compared rod-cone interactions in the output signals of the primate retina with those observed perceptually.

Based on the test results, the grid-to-rod fretting behavior was evaluated by comparing the rod vibration behavior with different simulated primary coolant conditions and the variations in the contact conditions.

To solve this problem, Escherichia coli was enlarged by over-expression of sulA gene to inhibit the cell division FtsZ ring assembly, leading to the formation of filamentary E. coli that have larger internal space for PHA accumulation compared with rod shape E. coli.

CRD is characterized by predominant or equal loss of cone compared to rod photoreceptors, reduced visual acuity, color-vision abnormalities, photophobia, and visual-field loss.