Sentence examples for comparing publications from inspiring English sources

Publication bias in human clinical trials has been measured by comparing publications to meeting abstracts, information on trials approved by human subjects ethics review committees, trial registries, and trials submitted to drug regulatory authorities [ 6- 12].

It has been suggested that comparing publications with the original protocol constitutes the most reliable means of evaluating the conduct and reporting of research, 24 and the Cochrane Collaboration has recommended such comparison to detect if complete or incomplete reporting is indicated.

Specific areas of major research activity were identified by comparing publication density on different organ systems and inter- and intrafield comparison was performed for selected countries.

Further studies comparing publication rates with similar meetings such as cardiology or respiratory societies or basic-science-focused meetings such as the Physiological Society would be interesting.

In an analysis that compares publications to population size as a gauge of significance, CAPS countries' health sector have been ranked as 'least studied' with only 0.16 1.71 publications per 100,000 population (24).

Our findings of biased publications agree with previous studies that have compared publications with clinical study reports or other types of comprehensive data sources, including those studies that focused on depression.

Chi-square tests were used to compare publication percentages for each category of variables.

To determine the publication rate of pharmacy resident projects from 2004 to 2007, compare publication rates of abstracts from regional and national pharmacy conferences, and assess characteristics of published abstracts.

Three methods were used to compare publication quality.

Three methods were used to compare publication characteristics.

We compared publication output in the life sciences with the overall output of all disciplines.