Your English writing platform
Free sign upSimilar(60)
We compare observations with predictions derived from a neutral model in which habitat is uniform and only dispersal and speciation influence species turnover.
Mishra, U. & Riley, W. J. Active-layer thickness across Alaska: comparing observation-based estimates with CMIP5 earth system model predictions.
This regression model was compared against a model with no interaction terms.
The experimental observations were compared against a 2D axisymmetric Eulerian Lagrangian model using ANSYS-Fluent v14.5.
We evaluate the predictions against the ground truth of ego users and compare against a Null Model to test the shadow profile hypothesis.
We calculated the frequencies of state pairs and compared against a null model assuming random matching.
To support this observation, we compared three regression models: a linear model and two log-linear models.
Time-varying vegetation cover characteristics were directly assimilated to the model from satellite observations, and model simulations of streamflow at the outlet of various catchments were compared against observations to assess the model's ability to capture basic patterns of space time seasonal variability within the basin.
Test 1 for Model A compared this model with the site-specific model M1 (neutral); test 2 compared model A against null model A. Model B was compared with the site-specific model M3 (discrete, K = 2).
We compared such observations with theoretical models.
The processed models are compared against the original model, against the models processed by the existing optimizers, and against a prototype shared model.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com