Sentence examples for comparing normalization from inspiring English sources

We began by testing whether compensation for the LTAS of a precursor signal is independent of the acoustic and perceptual characteristics of a precursor signal by comparing normalization at central processing levels in speech and nonspeech signals.

In 2001, van den Berghe and colleagues [ 7] published the first randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing normalization of glycemia by intensive insulin treatment (IIT) with conventional glycemic control in a surgical ICU (glucose target: 4.4 to 6.1 mmol/L versus 10.0 to 11.1 mmol/L).

Similarly, eQTL replication was used to compare normalization methods.

They compared normalization by endogenous controls, using the mean as a pseudo-control, and two different methods of quantile normalization.

To compare normalization models of attention with models where attention does not contribute to normalization we changed Eqns  (2) and (3) such that the attention term β does not appear in the denominator.

To confirm the conclusions based on our simulation study, we compared normalizations with the B-score and Loess methods using real drug testing data with the VCaP and LAPC4 screens (Table 1).

It can be applied not only to methods concerning sequencing depth but the proposed algorithm is also suitable to compare normalizations that take into account other sources of unwanted variation.

A detailed analysis for selected targets comparing this normalization strategy with the one recommended by Luminex™ (based on the spike-in controls) showed that for individual microRNAs expression patterns depend on the normalization strategy.

Several studies comparing different normalization methods have already been conducted, many of them focusing on Affymetrix chips [ 4- 7], others on Illumina chips [ 8- 12], and only very few have been conducted focusing on both technologies [ 13, 14].

We compared these normalization strategies to the un-normalized read count data (RC).

The kinetics of all of these exponential decay processes and the exponential association process are compared by normalization in Figure 6, panel F (1 minus the normalized value has been plotted in the case of the exponential association).