Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
This result shows that the proposed method is better or comparable performance compared with the method (M1), (M2) and (M3).
This method is considered less accurate compared with the method discussed above.
Compared with the method in [15], the proposed method in this paper has some significant differences.
Compared with the method in our previous study, it exhibits a higher scanning efficiency.
The extracted discontinuity orientations are compared with the method proposed by Riquelme et al. (2014).
As compared with the method in [21], the differentiability conditions of the method in the paper are mild.
We also used linear PCA feature extraction and the SVM classification algorithm compared with the method of this paper.
Therefore, it can be less sensitive to the bias error of the estimated variables, compared with the method in [13].
In M2, the visual quality of the restored images are good as compared with the method M1.
Compared with the method of the eigenpolynomial distribution, we do not need to solve an equation of the fourth degree.
This technique dealing with the nonlinear problem is simpler and clearer compared with the method of shooting.
More suggestions(16)
compared with the mode
assessed with the method
evaluated with the method
compared with the approaches
compared with the constructed
compared with the derived
compared with the calculated
compared with the preferred
compared with the arrangements
compared with the suggested
compare with the method
compared with the identified
compared with the processes
compared with the adopted
compared with the employed
compared with the used
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com