Exact(6)
Pattern similarity calculated from cosine similarity revealed that only T1 conditioning significantly increased the value of '2 hr after' when compared with the 'Before' value.
Compared with the before pain condition, both VL (Z = −2.59; p = 0.02) and VM (Z = −2.59; p = 0.02) MEP amplitude increased significantly during pain.
Double the number of chlamydia diagnoses were detected during the QIP period compared with the before period and over the whole study period there were only four gonorrhoea diagnoses.
(B and D ) To evaluate the effect of the drugs, the summed values of Ca2+ transients from the 30 to 35 s time points were compared with the 'Before' value (changing ratio).
(B and D ) The changing ratio of the summed values of Ca2+ transients between the 30 and 50 s time points compared with the 'Before' value (left panels), the peak of dF/F (middle panels), and the decay time constant (right panels).
However, compared with the before publication of the MOOSE Checklist, the quality of reporting improved significantly for 20 subitems after publication of the MOOSE Checklist, and 7 items of the included MAs demonstrated significant improvement after publication of the AMSTAR Checklist (p<0.05).
Similar(54)
Mortality risk of delirium in the after-period compared with the before-period and with CAM-ICU versus ICDSC (after-period) did not differ (before versus after-period, OR 0.82, p = 0.079 and ICDSC versus CAM-ICU, OR 1.03, p = 0.831).
The few studies established, reported higher figures when compared with the before-mentioned literature review [ 3].
In addition, the 28- and 90-day mortality rates in the after-SCT group were significantly lower compared with the before-SCT group.
Our null hypothesis was that there was no difference in the change in outcome before and after the intervention in the clinical trial, compared with the before-after change in the routine clinical setting.
In the original cohort, the proportion of male patients was significantly higher in the after-SCT group compared with the before-SCT group (68.2% versus 58.7%, P = 0.028), while APACHE II score and SOFA score were significantly lower in the after-SCT group compared to the before-SCT group (APACHE II score; 26.9 versus 28.4, P = 0.029 and SOFA score; 11.9 versus 14.2, P = 0.031).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com