Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(7)
Apparent ileal P digestibility coefficients of P determined for maize were higher (P < 0.001) in Method 2 compared with Method 1 whereas the opposite trend was observed for soybean meal.
The advantage of this approach compared with "Method 1" is that it is fully implemented by DataCite.
Compared with method [1], the method proposed here does not need segmentation and requires only one threshold.
This increases the rate of false-positives and thus reduces the specificity of method (1) compared with method (2), which explains the metaregression findings.
(3) Use of CSF p-tau181 and CSF Aβ42, and then Aβ 42/40 ratio in case of discrepancy (method 3), attenuated the number of indeterminate results to 38 patients (10.4%; P < 0.001 compared with method 1).
By contrast, the use of Aβ 42/40 ratio only in patients with discordant results between p-tau181 and Aβ42 (method 3) improved the classification of patients, with a NRI at 10.5% (SE = 0.04, P = 0.003) compared with method 1.
Similar(53)
A complete quantum addition machine is presented and compared with methods employing unitary transformations first.
Agreement among progression methods using GDxVCC and GDxECC was strongest for method C (kappa=0.57, p=0.002) compared with methods A (kappa=0.41, p=0.01) and B (kappa=0.41, p=0.01).
Compared with methods based on allele-specific PCR, ultradeep sequencing covers a broader spectrum of mutations per assay.
DotKnot-PW was compared with methods that are freely available and use standard input and output formats.
Consider Example 1, in Table 6, the expansion iterative method and direct method are compared with our method.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com