Sentence examples for compared with items from inspiring English sources

The extent of offline consolidation was indexed as the difference in recognition memory score (d′) for items from the 4hr study session compared with items from the 15-min study session (i.e., [4 h score 15 min score]).

Offline consolidation was indexed as the difference in recognition memory score for items from the 4-h study session compared with items from the 15-min study session (Fig. 1).

As can be seen in the plot of accuracy data in Figure 2, overall performance was best for items that were encoded auditorily (mean accuracy = 0.947) compared with items that were encoded visually (mean accuracy = 0.89448).

Because our purpose was to derive the most parsimonious model, we excluded item 3 and item 20 based on their lower factor loadings compared with items 4 and 21.

Specifically, in the Nap group, there was superior retention of emotional items studied 4 h prior to testing (which passed through the brain-state of sleep) compared with items studied 15 min prior to testing (paired t-test, t(14) = 2.49, P = 0.02).

Thirty-six items on the PARK Tool were drawn from the POST; however only seventeen items could be directly compared with items assessed in Montreal, Canada, because a number of items drawn from the POST had been substantially modified for the PARK Tool, and because not all items on the POST used the kappa coefficient to estimate reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient was used instead).

Associative memory demonstrates a greater decline in older adults compared with item memory [ 1, 2].

After comparing with items in HPO, we classified the 107 four diagnostic methods' information, following six principles.

Subjects responded on average 31 ms faster on old items compared with new items (RT = 760 ms).

In addition, odd items were compared with even items.

Participants were faster responding to Hiragana items (847 ms) compared with Kanji items (904 ms; F1,33 = 27.3, P < 0.001) and for words (815 ms) compared with nonwords (937 ms; F1,33 = 17.3, P < 0.001).