Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(7)
Plasma-nano chitosan treated fabric performance was compared with control sample i.e. untreated fabric.
In addition, the level of ABCG2 mRNA expression was significantly different compared with control sample, and it was 2.277-fold 2.277-foldter treatment with IC50 of SN38-PEgreaterVer NPs (3 μmol/L) (p = 0.00).
As can be seen in Fig. 6, after analyzing real-time PCR data by REST and SPSS software, the level of ABCG2 mRNA expression was significantly different compared with control sample, and it was 4.793-fold 4.793-foldter treatment with IC50 of SN38 (1 μmol/L) (p = 0.00).
The level of PPAR γ was normalised to GAPDH and expressed as arbitrary fold change compared with control sample.
Relative mRNA expression levels of Foxp3 of GCSE treated samples were compared with control sample by qRT-PCR and protein level of Foxp3 was measured by flow cytometry.
Compared with control sample, the most-abundant transcripts in the cold-treated sample were dehydrin, the LEA protein precursor, SRC1 protein, defensin D1, early light inducible protein, SOS2-like protein kinase, Ethylene-responsive transcription factor, and sucrose synthase.
Similar(53)
These results were compared with control samples with no degradation.
Serum profiling from individuals with SLE revealed that among several targets, elevated IgG autoantibody reactivity to B cell-activating factor (BAFF) was associated with SLE compared with control samples.
For this purpose, plates with vertical and inclined holes were tested under low velocity impact and the respective results were compared with control samples without hole.
MTT assay on primary corneal epithelial cells revealed that in situ gel formulations loaded with KT showed reasonable and acceptable percent cell viability compared with control samples.
Results: Increased levels of cyclic guanosine monophosphate, cyclo-oxygenase 2, prostaglandin F2α, and prostaglandin E2 were found in samples that were exposed to isosorbide 5-mononitrate compared with control samples.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com