Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
In order to have designs that could be easily compared, we considered different designs with 5 VL or 7 VL but constant total numbers of observations per group ntot = N×n.
Similar(59)
When two coauthor names a1 and a2 are compared, we consider they correspond to the same coauthor if similarity(a1, a2) > = tCoauthor.
In the analyses where the CG and 1000G datasets where compared, we only considered SNPs that were in exonic regions both targeted by the 1000G project and fully sequenced in all 42 CG samples.
To compare models, we considered goodness-of-fit, applicability, and parsimony.
Since BT10 has a significantly lower activity for RARs compared to ATRA, we considered that BT10 might have low activity for RXRs, not detected under these conditions.
As the SNP densities in the CPS SNP-enriched windows are higher in a single population compared to others, we considered whether there was any relationship between CPS SNP-enriched windows and higher recombination rates.
As a straight application to compare them, we consider the design of a set of controllers to achieve a finite time consensus.
In order to compare them, we consider the delay-Doppler subspace of the corresponding ambiguity functions bounded by and and plot their respective CDFs.
When comparing all syllables, we considered those context-specific syllables as well as those syllables that occurred both in spontaneous and in reactive song.
In cases of star networks (that is, all interventions were compared with a common comparator but not against each other) and fully connected networks (all interventions were compared with each other), we considered that the network structure was clear provided that the authors explicitly mentioned the interventions and direct comparisons between the interventions included in the network.
Trace-driven simulations with actual Web cache logs show that LEC offers the performance of caches more than twice its size compared with other algorithms we considered.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com