Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
Hence, previous approaches may not adaptively adjust the significance of the temporal fingerprints that depends on the difference between the temporal variances of compared videos, leading to performance degradation in video copy detection.
Objective metrics can be used for estimating the relative quality differences, but they typically give reliable results only if the compared videos contain similar types of quality distortion.
Notably, whether we compared videos to daylong audio-recordings or peak audio times, videos featured relatively fewer declaratives and more questions; furthermore, the most common video-recorded nouns were less consistent across families than the top audio-recording nouns were.
It is worth noting that these methods rarely provide a satisfaction level of 5 since human perception is reluctant to assign the maximum score (i.e., perfect perceived quality) even if the compared videos are identical.
Cumulative plots (G ) were generated starting at 16.5 hAPF, the earliest time common to all compared videos.
All cumulated shear curves start at 16.2 hAPF, which is the earliest common time point registered in all compared videos, including the dist-sev#2 video shown in Figure 8 figure supplement 1A,B.
Similar(54)
A study by Gupta et al. [6] compared video capsule endoscopy with MR enteroclysis in 19 patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.
Recently, several studies have compared video laryngoscopes to the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubations [ 13- 15].
Kamin et al. [ 12] compared video- and text-based cases in problem-based learning in virtual and face-to-face settings.
Comparing videos of your swing with those of Tiger, Ernie and Woosie is as deflating as standing in the mirror alongside Brad Pitt, but useful all the same.
But you can draw lines on your video and build a library of swings, and iSwing Golf lets you compare videos side by side, in synchronized motion, which is useful for underscoring changes in your stroke.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com