Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
The modified NSGA-II and NSGA-II were compared using five multi-objective metrics, four of which proved the supremacy of the proposed algorithm.
The models performance were evaluated and compared using five performance criteria namely coefficient of efficiency, root mean square error, error of total volume, relative error of peak discharge and error of time for peak to arrive.
The concentration of PSTs was quantified and compared using five different analytical methods: the mouse bioassay, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), receptor-binding assay, the commercially available Jellett Rapid PSP Test strips, and an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay technique.
First the MSVC and SCC protocols were compared using five dilutions for each of the following stock viruses: DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3, DEN-4, YF, SLE, WN, ILH, GC, ORO, MAY and VEE.
Similar(56)
In the first experiment, two treatments were compared using three replicates of two birds per chamber.
MOVPE growth of InN on sapphire substrates is compared using two different designs of horizontal reactor.
Since preferences for the attributes are unknown, alternatives are compared using four hypothetical attribute-weighting schemes.
Streptomycin production from chitin by Streptomyces griseus was compared using two different types of bioreactor.
The performances of different algorithms are assessed and compared using three statistical metrics.
The results of these methods are compared using four recognized methods of slope stability.
Three different concentrations of the polymer solution were compared using two different immobilisation times for two CMD polymers.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com