Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Human and avian sequence subsets were compared, using a method based on mutual information, to identify characteristic sites where human isolates present conserved mutations.
The two regression coefficients (b1989-94 and b1999-2005) were compared using a method previously described [ 3], where an interaction term (product of years per a dummy variable being 0 for the baseline period and 1 for the second period) was used to test the null hypothesis H0: b1989-94 = b1999-2005.
Similar(58)
Histopathologic scores were compared using a nonparametric method (Steel-Dwass method).
MIC and MBC data are most properly compared using a nonparametric method such as the Mann−Whitney test, which makes no assumption about an underlying distribution and is appropriate for discrete data.
The AUC and its 95% confidence intervals were estimated for each biomarker to predict different CAP etiologies (bacterial, viral, mixed, and bacterial-involved) and compared using a nonparametric method.
Oxidation resistance in air of three grades of nuclear graphite with different structures was compared using a standard thermogravimetric method.
The proportion of cancer patients and healthy controls mounting a response to 5T4 was compared using a closed form method for comparing differences and calculating confidence intervals [21].
These were compared using a log-rank method.
The data for the proportion of dystrophic neurons was compared using a normal approximation method (need references).
TNFα and IL-10 production according to stimulation (control, A. fumigatus conidia only, conidia + antifungal drug, conidia + antifungals + GM-CSF) was evaluated and each compared using a commercial ELISA method.
Summary statistics from pseudo-observed and simulated data are compared using an ABC method (Beaumont et al. 2002) implemented in R (Csilléry et al. 2012) (package downloaded from and available at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/abc/index.html).html
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com