Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Why thermophilicity and halotolerance is linked with the distributions of purine tracts is not known, but RR-stretches appear to be more stable compared to YR-stretches [ 4].
The impact of long-term storage (1 yr compared to 14 yrs and 18 yrs) of FFPE samples was investigated in samples retrieved from the tissue bank of the Institute of Pathology [16].
The Gothenburg subjects were significantly older than the Paris subjects (Mann-Whitney U = 1072, p = 0.003) with a median age of 30 yrs (range 19 60 yrs) as compared to 25 yrs (range 16 47 yrs) in Paris.
The mean age of patients in the study group was 4.47 yrs compared to 5.67 yrs in the control group (p = 0.656).
As compared to 1-yr non-survivors, 1-yr survivors had same no- and low-flow (from CPR start to VA-ECMO depart), their initial rhythm was more frequently shockable (69.2% versus 33.8%, respectively, p = 0.03) and their day-1 SOFA score was significantly lower (13 [10 14] versus 15 [12 17], respectively, p = 0.02).
Patients with silicosis had poor survival (median survival 2.4 yr; confidence interval (CI): 0.16 7.88 yr) compared to IPF patients (5.3 yr; CI: 2.8 15 yr; p = 0.07), and experienced early rejection of their lung grafts (0.9 yr; CI: 0.22 0.9 yr) following lung transplantation (2.4 yr; CI 1.5 3.6 yr; p<0.05).
The mean age of household contacts was 22.64 yrs in the study group compared to 26.20 yrs in the control group (p = 0.124).
There was a non-significant trend towards class 3 having higher odds of being aged 35-54 yrs compared to age 18-34 yrs.
Slightly higher values were found in Erdalen, with a mean rockwall retreat rate of 0.57 mm yr− 1 compared to 0.50 mm yr− 1 in Bødalen.
Of those with secondary/tertiary education 65.4percentt were reported to be insured.18 to 29 years old were the highest insured group (44.2%) compared to the 15 17 yr (35.8%) and 30 49 yr (37%) (Table 1).
However, non respondents were younger (mean 23.71 yrs) compared to respondents (mean 25.33 yrs; p = 0.04).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com