Sentence examples for compared to their mean from inspiring English sources

Volcanoes in the Lesser Antilles have a very short period of historical data compared to their mean eruption cycle of hundreds of years, and most of the volcanoes had very few observed magmatic eruptions (Lindsay et al., 2005).

The mean NRS scores of both postal responder and non-responder patients at 20-30 min and 1 month after injection were statistically significantly improved compared to their mean baseline scores.

Genes with unexpectedly high or low values, compared to their mean values, are classed as 1 or −1 respectively, using the method of Quackenbush [31], where each sample is compared to the mean of all samples in the dataset.

Additionally, we found using Expression Atlas (Kapushesky et al., 2012) that nine of the positive candidates (including PPARγ and the top candidate ZEB1) are expressed significantly higher in adipose tissue compared to their mean expression across tissues.

For a third set of maps, displays were made of the distributions for demographic variables of interest that exhibited significantly different means in zip codes receiving wave 1 notices compared to their means in zip codes receiving wave 2 notices.

The prevalence of obesity was greater among offspring mean age 12.3 years compared to their parentschild mean age 12.6 years (18.4% vs 10.1%, p<0.001) even though hours of television (TV) watching were similar between the two generations as children (p=0.80).

While excellent at entrapping these drugs, their release was relatively fast (2.2 h half-life) compared to their intended mean residence time in the human body.

A similar parental perception of lower PedsQL™ scores compared to their children (mean scores of 70 and 78, respectively) has been observed with functional abdominal pain [ 22].

This can be compared to their reported mean economic damage costs from direct physical damage, which was 3,816,105 VND/household (see Table 6).

This could be related to the fact that standard deviations of many groups/subgroups were too big compared to their respective means, which probably made it difficult to obtain statistical significant differences between teeth with different anatomy aspects.

Data indicated that, the DL students received higher mean scores in the final examination compared to their F2F peers (Mean = 73.20, SD = 8.53; Mean = 66.64, SD = 11.23, respectively) with a statistically significant difference (U = 530.50, p = .009).009