Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(34)
Thermal simulations have been performed by finite element method and compared to the experiments.
Compared to the experiments the model generally under-predicted the mean crushing force.
Theoretical analyses with these structural and fluid finite elements gave satisfactory results compared to the experiments.
The total axial load at failure for this case resulted in less than 10% error as compared to the experiments.
In these test cases, the energy consumption is significantly reduced compared to the experiments by improving the spatial and temporal distribution of the thermal energy usage.
The model is compared to the experiments available in the literature and NFPA 68 standards at different vent areas and equivalent ratios.
Similar(26)
Moreover, Monte Carlo simulation was undertaken using MCNP4C code and the relative difference of 1.9% was observed compared to the experiment.
Furthermore, finite element simulation results were compared to the experiment, in which a viscoplastic constitutive model was employed.
When compared to the experiment, the fitted one-step scheme yields better predictions than the standard scheme.
The fatigue life prediction result was compared to the experiment S N curve test data and gave good agreement.
The separating rate (i.e. sample weight per second) is considerably improved in the present apparatus compared to the experiment recently operated in μg conditions8, because it can continuously separate the particles in open air under normal gravity conditions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com