First, the simulation results shown in Figure 3 indicate that, largely as a result of the lower worm breakpoint boundary, the size of the basin of attraction to the stable endemic state is larger compared to the corresponding size of the attraction basin pertaining to the extinct state in the case of the culicine-parasite system as opposed to the situation for anopheline filariasis.
The size of the halo compared to the colony size was calculated and compared to the corresponding size of the parental strain QM9414.
Because of their small size, ENMs possess chemical or physical characteristics improved compared to the corresponding macro-sized material.
Because of the differences in size distributions between the two techniques (single size distribution in DLS vs bimodal distribution in TRPS, Figure 1 ), the DLS size distributions are compared to the corresponding primary TRPS (peak) size distributions.
In scenarios where the negative class is larger than the positive class, NPV is inflated and PPV is lower compared to the corresponding model where the class sizes are equal and the negative and predictive classes have the same rate of correct predictions [ 19].
The results exhibited that the particle size for MIP nanoparticles was about 557.6 nm, and the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller analysis also confirmed that the particle pores were mesopores and macropores around 40 nm and possessed higher volume, surface area, and uniform size compared to the corresponding NIPs.
Therefore, the elution profile of the precipitated fraction lacked the largest molecular size components, compared to the corresponding whole HA.
Further investigation reveals that capacitance improvement for the Co3O4/rGO/NF structure is mainly because of a higher specific surface area (~87.8 m2 g−1) and a more optimal mesoporous size (4 15 nm) compared to the corresponding values of 67.1 m2 g−1 and 6 25 nm, respectively, for the Co3O4/NF structure.
To evaluate to what extent protein function in practice influence protein length, we studied the frequency of different biochemical activities among yeast proteins in different size intervals and compared to the corresponding frequency among all yeast proteins (Fig 4A).
However, a small fraction (20 of 660, 3%) of the markers showed different allele size and/or number of alleles compared to the corresponding in silico results.
Also in this case no significant differences were recorded in the cell size of transgenic red fruits compared to the corresponding wild type ones (Fig. 4a).
