Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
When the body size of living monoplacophorans is compared to size distributions from the Early Paleozoic (Stuber and Lindberg, unpub)., only living monoplacophorans living in the hadal zone (>6000 m) are comparable, although the mean size of the Paleozoic taxa is well within one standard deviation of the mean size of most living abyssal species (Fig. 8).
Index lesion size on imaging was compared to size on surgical pathology.
The size of each microsatellite region based on sequence data was compared to size determined by fragment genotyping.
Where questions of ligand stoichiometry are important, this technique gives a more accurate, quantitative description of biochemical valency compared to size or charge dependent analyses.
Analysis of the coefficient of variation revealed that swing length variability was unchanged in pcd compared to size matched controls (F 81,1)=0.14, p = 0.0.71).
Tail height dominated the second component (shape) of the principal components analysis (PCA; Table 2), and tail height compared to size reliably separated aquatic from terrestrial individuals.
Similar(48)
With the advent of Next-Generation Sequencing technology, sequencing of short tandem repeats (STRs) allows for a more detailed analysis when compared to size-based fragment methods (capillary electrophoresis-CE).
Moreover, in the small number of very large encapsulated insulinomas in PKO-βTag mice, we found a dramatic reduction in tumor vascularity (Figure 5D) compared to size-matched tumors in WT-βTag mice (Figure 5C).
The sizes of colonies obtained in the screen were compared to sizes of control colonies.
When spread on large fibronectin islands, more hBMCs and hPDCs displayed ALP activity (Fig. 5E) and increased ALP gene expression (Fig. 5F) as compared to size-restricted cells.
In striking contrast, however, both the nose and the tail of pcd mice exhibited large side-to-side oscillations during the locomotor cycle (compared to size-matched controls: nose F(13.48,1) = 5.49, p < 0.05, tail F(415,1) = 91.01, p < 0.001).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com