Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(8)
* indicates significant difference between the Soloway score compared to score 0. The level of each marker was calculated relative to the marker level at Soloway score zero.
In a first step, all variables collected during the course of the study were evaluated for their potential association with patient-reported compliance (MMAS score = 4 compared to score < 4) using univariate analysis.
Levels of CTXItotal, CTXII and CTXII/CTXItotal changed +900%, +130%, and -90%, respectively at Soloway score 4 compared to score 0. The in vitro experiments revealed that osteoclasts released CTXI fragments but not CTXII from bone specimens.
The Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) tended to be lower for tumors with higher levels of SUSD4 transcripts (p = 0.054), which indicated that 85%% of patients with SUSD4-expressing tumors survived for at least 5 years (NPI score ≤3.4; compared to score ≥5.4 which represented a 5 year survival rate of 50%%).
The extension of intramural lesions at the level of neo-terminal ileum was significantly greater in patients with Rutgeerts score 4 (p < 0.001), 3 (p = 0.03) and 2 (p = 0.04) compared to score 1 and did not significantly differ among patients with score 2, 3 and 4 (figure 2B).
The application of the Charlson index to the primary diagnosis yielded an odds ratio of 2.41 for cases with score greater than or equal to 1, as compared to score equal to 0. This index also displayed an upward gradient when applied to comorbidities (Table 4, baseline model).
Similar(52)
Compared to scoring auctions, CPAM has some advantages.
It has executed only three people in recent decades, compared to scores in Virginia and Alabama, and it has a temporary moratorium in place.
Scores two days later actually improved compared to scores on the day of the video when feedback was given about the correct answers.
Prepresentation scores of attendees were compared to scores of nonattendees to assess the generalizability of results.
The concordance methods are difficult to understand compared to scoring and compromising methods.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com