Sentence examples for compared to posterior from inspiring English sources

A main effect of Site [ F 3, 492) = 8.178, p = 0.001] occurred due to significantly larger P3a amplitudes in the fronto-central electrodes compared to posterior sites (FCz > Pz, p < 0.001 and Cz > Pz, p < 0.001).

The Bgn−/0/Lum−/− corneas exhibited significantly increased opacity throughout the stroma compared to posterior opacity in the Lum−/− and no opacity in Bgn−/0 or wild type corneas.

Anterior portion of pronotal dorsum lightly sculptured compared to posterior portion of pronotum.

A main effect of region [F 1,60) = 50.7, p<0.01] suggested more negative voltages at anterior (mean: −1.9 µV) and central regions (mean: −1.0 µV) compared to posterior regions (mean: 2.5 µV).

When normalized to PLCβ2, a taste-selective phospholipase, we found that expression of OXTR is higher in anterior taste buds (fungiform, palate) compared to posterior (vallate, foliate) taste buds (Fig. 1C).

BCS knees have greater active flexion compared to posterior stabilized and cruciate retaining knee arthroplasty [ 17].

Both approaches have negative impact on pulmonary function when compared to posterior-only approach [ 11, 12].

CT scans of the chest have greater sensitivity compared to posterior-anterior chest x-rays in detecting small non-calcified nodules that may represent early lung cancers; however, this technique has poor specificity because of the high prevalence of non-calcified and ground glass pulmonary nodules [ 2, 3].

These novel features are the ranking score, computed as the rank of the posterior probability of the detection compared to the posterior probability of all the arcs in the lattice where the detection resides and the relative posterior probability of the detection compared to the maximum posterior probability within the arcs in the lattice where the detection resides.

This randomized study was conducted to determine whether non-weight-bearing passive flexion was superior for knees receiving a posterior stabilized high flexion device compared to a posterior stabilized standard device in the contra-lateral knee.

The posterior mean of Prior 6b is therefore closer to the ML estimate when compared to the posterior mean of Prior 6a.