Sentence examples for compared to judgment from inspiring English sources

Given that utilitarian endorsements have been found to be greater in moral action paradigms when compared to judgment counterparts17 and that virtual moral dilemmas often elicit a greater proportion of simulated utilitarian actions10,14,18, we predicted that utilising this virtual action framework would lead to an increase in simulated utilitarian responses.

The purpose of this descriptive investigation was to explore perceptual judgments of speech naturalness, compared to judgments of articulation, language, disfluency, and speaking rate, in the speech of two youths who differed in cluttering severity.

Correct judgments on new pictures showed an increased activation in the anterior parahippocampus bilaterally and the right anterior hippocampus compared to judgments on old pictures in the recognition experiment.

Specifically, there was increased parietal engagement (a visuo-spatial attentional region) when East Asians made absolute judgments compared to relative judgments, whereas Westerners showed increased parietal activity when making relative judgments compared to absolute judgments.

Peer judgment is either compared to faculty judgment or self-reports and the quality of PA is determined by a criterion validity approach [ 12, 14- 17].

However, when NGAL was added to the ED physician's clinical judgment the AUC was increased compared to clinical judgment alone or compared to the combination of clinical judgment and eGFR (MDRD or Cockroft-Gault).

From the societal perspective, when ≥20% of cases were influenza, clinical judgment followed PCR as the next most cost-effective, then by point-of-care (≤$215,650/QALY compared to clinical judgment) and point-of-care plus clinical judgment (≤$14,998/QALY compared to point-of-care alone).

In a pandemic influenza scenario, PCR testing dominated, followed by clinical judgment, and point-of-care testing (≤$287,530/QALY compared to clinical judgment).

From the third-party payor perspective, the do nothing strategy emerged as the most cost-effective, then clinical judgment ($47,841/QALY), and point-of-care testing ($202,124/QALY compared to clinical judgment).

The outcome-by-judgment interaction effect was observed in (a) a mixed-design and (b) a within-subjects design such that the difference in ratings for negative versus neutral outcomes was greater for punishment judgments as compared to wrongness judgments.

An incorrect flag could indicate a milder judgment or a stricter judgment, compared to the normative judgment of the expert panel.