Sentence examples for compared to a cue from inspiring English sources

In both hemispheres, the percent signal change was greater following a cue signaling a contraversive saccade as compared to a cue signaling an ipsiversive saccade (paired t-test, degrees of freedom: 12, P < 0.05) irrespective of the plan or the changed plan of an upcoming eye movement.

Activation of the PPC was also increased when two cues were presented successively as compared to a single cue.

Activation of areas along the dorsal pathway and corresponding signal time courses are displayed in Figure 2. The PPC spreading from the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) to the superior parietal lobule was labeled by an enhanced signal change in case that two cues were successively presented compared to a single-cue (degrees of freedom: 12, P < 0.01, uncorrected).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04478.008 The data presented so far suggests that even when the highly salient R cue is present, monkeys allocate slightly more attention to the 'non-rewarded' field when a P cue appeared there (R/P trials) compared to an N cue (R/N trials).

Area V5 revealed an enhanced and prolonged fMRI signal in case two cues were successively presented as compared to an individual cue.

These recognition cues may be conceptualized as a label, which is compared to a neural representation of acceptable cue combinations termed the template.

We hypothesized that infants would react with an enhanced Nc component to objects that had been gaze cued by a fearful compared to a neutral face before.

All experiments so far [14] [20] have reported an increase in performance when a retro-cue is provided compared to when no cue or a cue during the probe array is provided (a so-called post-cue).

Results indicated that self-reported craving was elevated in response to cigarette cues compared to other valenced cue types and craving was higher to pleasant cues than either neutral or unpleasant cues.

This was evidenced by increased instrumental response rates during presentations of an auditory cue previously associated with reward delivery, compared to presentations of a cue not associated with the reward.

Performance was significantly higher at all cue latencies when a retro-cue was shown compared to when a post-cue was shown (smallest t-value [t(19) = 7.92, p<.001]).