Exact(10)
We reveal that humans pervasively underestimate their performance in the absence of feedback, compared to a condition with full feedback, despite objective performance being unaffected.
Therefore, it appears that even simple feedback provides a certain degree of interaction, compared to a condition where the interviewer is absent.
Thus, finding a set of variables that can simultaneously follow all the objectives is rare and difficult, compared to a condition when only one objective is pursued.
Thus, finding variable sets that can simultaneously follow all objectives, compared to a condition where only one objective can be followed, is difficult and rare.
It was shown that categorical similarity between working memory content and the target stimuli pertaining to the attentional task (both digits) increased attentional blink magnitude compared to a condition in which this similarity was absent (colors and digits, respectively).
The performance in this task was compared to a condition in which the y/n response was given after motion discrimination (delayed y/n task), a condition that replicated the temporal structure of the main experiment, where the PA score was reported after the discrimination response.
Similar(50)
The difficulty-controlled task was performed after administration of placebo and after administration of MP (20 mg, oral), and these conditions were compared to a control condition, which consisted of viewing nature cards with not performance required (non-task condition) after being given a placebo.
Second, very often research questions are approached from a single perspective, i.e. a condition of interest is compared to a reference condition.
In two experiments, these conditions were compared to a control condition receiving conventional tasks without built-in task support.
In each experiment, different test conditions were compared to a reference condition.
However, data from our previous study on moderate ergometer cycling [ 20] have shown that a pre-encoding exercise condition does not improve performance compared to a sedentary condition.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com