Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
By combining these effects the short circuit current density and the energy conversion efficiency are increased by 29% and 24% respectively compared to a cell without SGSs.
A cell with the CPL-coated Li metal anode exhibited more than 3 times higher discharge capacity at the 80th cycle compared to a cell without the CPL.
Similar(58)
The results show that the proposed cell association scheme yields significant performance improvement comparing to a cell association technique without caching considerations.
The MSDTIRC-PV structure is capable of providing a maximum power concentration of 4.2× when compared to a similar cell without the concentrator.
The proposed scheme enhances power conversion efficiency by 22%, compared to a GaAs solar cell without CdS QDs.
The results show the cell with NaYF4 Yb3+, Er3+ achieves a power conversion efficiency of 7.65% under one sun illumination (AM 1.5G, 100 mW cm−2), which is an increase of 14% compared to the cell without NaYF4 Yb3+, Er3+ (6.71%).
Compared to the cell without n/i- buffers, cell efficiency increases from 5.7%to6.5%5% when double buffer layers were used.
Interestingly, in a xenograft model, CL4 fibro-blasts enhance the growth of mammary tumors by approximately eight- fold compared to CL3 cells, without a detectable increase in angiogenesis.
This constitutes a ∼2.35 fold increase when STLC pretreated cells are compared to prometaphase cells without NDGA treatment and a ∼2.15 fold increase for cells pretreated with MG132 compared to metaphase cells without NDGA treatment (Figure 4C).
Compared to the cells without rear passivation, a 0.6%% improvement in PCE was obtained.
Significant reduction in cell growth and viability in human LoVo and HCT116 colon cancer cells treated with TKTL1 siRNA as compared to LoVo/HCT116 cells without RNAi treatment in a cell culture model using quantitative PCR was demonstrated by two different groups [ 14, 17].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com