Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
To characterize the distribution of polymorphism in these anomalous regions, we compared summaries of polymorphism, linkage disequilibrium (Z nS), and the SFS (using Tajima's D) in the 152 aberrant windows with randomly selected windows using a simple randomization test.
Similar(11)
We systematically reviewed the available evidence, and obtained and compared summary estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of cytology and the urine based markers bladder tumor antigen, BTA stat (Polymedco, Redmond, Washington), BTA TRAK (Polymedco), NMP22 (Matritech, Cambridge, Massachusetts), telomerase and fibrin degradation product in detecting primary bladder cancer.
We compared summary statistics using Spearman correlations, chi-square tests for proportions, and t-tests for continuous data.
We used an intention to treat approach, where we compared summary variables in the intervention and control arms with adjustment for clustering.
Table 1 compares summaries of the posterior distribution of cumulative cost arising under adaptive management to those predicted under the optimal static policy using parameters estimated for the misspecified model based on a completely observed epidemic.
We compare summaries by calculating Accuracy for each summary as in Equation (1).
In Table 1, I explore the impact of the latter two restrictions by comparing summary statistics for the full sample with the sample matched to birth data and the sibling-pair sample.
Both are within-species tests that compare summary statistics of allele frequency distribution against values expected under neutral evolution.
Table 2 compares summary statistics of the USEPA monitoring data with those of the kriged predictions at NHIS respondent locations.
17 Wilcoxon-Sign-Rank tests were used to compare summary statistics in sleep-state, age and artefact rejection comparisons.
The bivariate random effects model was used to compare summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity for each of the index tests.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com