Sentence examples for compared selection from inspiring English sources
We next compared selection within OLPs that contained or lacked BDEs, and found that responsive OLPs without BDEs had a higher rate of positively selected residues compared to those containing BDEs (44% vs. 29%, P = 0.04, Fig. 1c).
Interestingly, no studies appear to have explicitly compared selection from before to after habitat loss, although such information seems critical to interpreting potential adaptive responses in the affected population (see Stockwell et al. 2003).
Brown et al. (2008) compared selection applied in Conover and Munch (2002) experiments to that in realistic fisheries and showed that evolutionary rates in wild stocks are expected to be 2.5 5 times slower than in experiments.
To investigate whether spore structural diversity influenced coat protein evolution, we then compared conservation of protein compositions in the inner and outer coat layers, compared selection pressures of coat proteins genes with others, and finally studied how selection pressure changes along evolutionary branches within gene trees.
To test whether modified nucleotides improve SELEX, we compared selections with modified and unmodified nucleotides targeting thirteen "difficult" human proteins that had repeatedly failed SELEX with unmodified DNA.
To compare selection rules, we first identify some general facts about selection rules.
Limited data directly compare selection of mechanically "optimal" or "best" PEEP in both supine and prone positions, either with or without changes in chest wall compliance.
Limited data are available that directly compare selection of mechanically "optimal" or "best" PEEP in both supine and prone positions, either with or without further stiffening of the chest wall by increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP).
Overall, the available data make it difficult to compare selection coefficients across species and studies.
Figure 2b compares selection on traditional BLUP-EBV to GS schemes when the selection candidates also have phenotypic information.
Tukey's significant differences implemented in SYSTAT were used to compare selection coefficients among the five inoculants.
